Occasionally and without good reason more of something will appear on this site. Also, Michelle Malkin.
"Those who would lie under oath are in big trouble"Clinton didn't get in big trouble now did he dickhead
No, he didn't. Nor did he get in trouble for chronic sexual harassment, fondling, indecent exposure, or date rape. People remember him as the President who almost got impeached instead of the one who did get impeached but didn't get punished in any meaningful way.On a separate note, I see that you called Ron Silver a dumbass and then someone (not me) called you a dickhead. Is this what passes for dialogue in your view? Dismissing a carefully presented line of argumentation with a one-line purjorative, as though the bold brevity of your ad-honinem makes you right?Never mind. I suspect this question also makes me a dumbass.
Great, now I've opened myself up for spelling flames. Make that 'pejorative.' :-)
He in fact did get in trouble. Please read.
No, he didn't. How many seconds did he spend in jail, or even handcuffed? Why should Bonds suffer differently? "Do the crime, serve the time" should not have any exceptions for political leanings.
No, he didn't.Okay, you don't call fines, suspensions or impeachment trials trouble. That makes you stupid.Note: the post you are replying to contains irony. I also don't like Bill Clinton.
How many home runs did Clinton hit? Jeeze, the fascination people have with his pee-pee never ceases to amaze me.And I hope Barry beats it.
Post a Comment